State of California v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a state waives its immunity defense only where stated by the most express language or by such overwhelming implication from the text as will leave no room for any other reasonable construction.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Tamashiro v. Department of Human Services · NH v. Blind Vendors

2. “[T]he Secretary shall convene an ad hoc arbitration panel . . . [,] give notice, conduct a hearing, and render its decision which shall be subject to appeal and review as a final agency action for purposes of chapter 7 of such title 5 [5 USCS §§ 701 et seq.].”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Tamashiro v. Department of Human Services · NH v. Blind Vendors

3. “The evidence that Congress conditioned State participation in the Randolph-Sheppard program on federal mention sovereign immunity at all in its reguest for rulings of law submitted to the arbitration panel. In Count II of the petition the State filed to initiate this case, the State asserted that sovereign immunity precluded the arbitration panel's award of money damages and precluded the panel's jurisdiction over it - an argument never pressed before the panel itself. 38 judicial enforcement of compensatory awards is overwhelming.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. NH v. Blind Vendors