15798b v. Dar Light’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Palmer v. University Medical Group (1998), Gorecki v. Massanari (2001)
12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 15229b v. Dar Lester · 15161b v. Dar a Smolen · Andrews v. Shalala · Bunnell v. Sullivan · Embrey v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o find the claimant not credible the ALJ must rely either on reasons unrelated to the subjective testimony (e.g. reputation for dishonesty), or conflicts between his testimony and his own conduct, or on internal contradictions in that testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Pain of sufficient severity caused by a medically diagnosed 'anatomical, physiological, or psychological abnormality' may provide the basis for determining that a claimant is disabled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Leusch v. Berryhill“insofar as the record contains persuasive evidence to support the deviation.” Light v. Social Security Admin., 119 F.3d 789 , 793 (9th Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hayes v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.