Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Fla. 365 - Twyman McCarthy v. Smith

Twyman McCarthy v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1997
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1997

6 state decisions

201935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque Bank · Chemical Nat Bank of Chicago v. Hartford Deposit Co · Rosenblatt v. Johnston · Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Idaho ex rel. Allen · Title Guaranty Surety Company of Scranton v. State of Idaho O W Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The comptroller's seizure of a bank, trust company, or building and loan association as an unsound or insolvent public institution, it is true, supersedes the power of the officers, directors, and stockholders thereof to continue to carry on the ordinary business thereof, but its seizure and the appointment of a liquidating agent for it does not amount to a dissolution of the corporation such as will preclude the rendition of a judgment against it. On the contrary, the bank, trust company, or building and loan association so taken in charge by the state through its officers, continues to exist as a legal entity, until the final confirmation of its liquidation in the courts, and may still sue and be sued in its corporate name to finally close up its business, and all claims of creditors against it as a defunct corporation may be proved either before the comptroller or liquidator, or be sued for and regularly established by a suit at law or in equity against the corporation itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.