Zanni v. Lippold’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2015
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1691 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · United States v. Morton · United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · Swanson v. American Consumer Industries, Inc. · 87 Ill. 2d 7 - Miner v. Gillette Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.