Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 FSUPP 295 - Holt v. Middlebrook

Holt v. Middlebrook’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
March 1978
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Rybolt v. Jarrett · Pearson v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. · 68 F. Supp. 25 - La May v. Maddox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No person not a resident of this State nor any corporation not authorized to do business in this State shall be appointed or allowed to qualify or act as personal representative, or trustee under a will, of any decedent, or appointed as guardian of an infant or committee of any person non compos' mentis, unless there • be' also appointed to serve with the non-resident personal representative, trustee, guardian or committee, a person resident in this State or corporation authorized to do business in this State; and in the event such resident personal representative, trustee, or guardian ceases, for any reason to act, then a new resident personal representative, trustee, or guardian shall he appointed in the same manner as provided in § 26-48; provided that when the non-resident guardian or committee is the parent of the infant or person non compos mentis, the resident guardian appointed under this section shall have no control over the person of the ward. Nothing in this section shall be con strued to impair the validity of any appointment or qualification made prior to June seventeenth, nineteen hundred and twenty-four, nor to affect in any way the other provisions of this chapter or of § 64-123. The provisions of this section shall not authorize or allow any appointment or qualification prohibited by § 6-9.” (1924, p.415; 1936, p. 760; Michie Code 1942, § 5400a; 1950, p. 724.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.