119 Ga. 21
Decided November 14, 1903
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1903-11-14
<p>Motion to dismiss the writ of error.</p>
Relies on Smith v. Willis · Bacon & Co. v. Capital City Bank
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1903-11-14
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 1964 · most notably Moore v. Selman (1964), Grizzel v. Grizzel (1939)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶11. An order dissolving, vacating, or modifying an interlocutor injunction and appointment of a receiver is not reviewable by a “ fast ” writ of error. Bacon v. Capital City Bank, 105 Ga. 700; Smith v. Willis, 107 Ga. 792, and cases cited. This was, in effect, ruled in this case at the last term.
¶22. As such an order is not a final adjudication of the case, a writ of error sued out to review the same is premature and must be dismissed. Civil Code, § 5526. Writ of error dismissed.