Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Idaho 285 - State v. Robran

State v. Robran’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably State v. Jones (2004), State v. Lampien (2009)

32 state decisions

210199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hamling v. United States · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Pheaster · State v. Lankford · State v. Fenley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether an Information conforms to the requirements of law is a question subject to free review. A legally sufficient Information is a plain, concise, and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. The sufficiency of an Information ultimately depends on whether it fulfills the basic functions of the pleading instrument. Under this functional analysis, we examine, first, whether the Information contains the elements of the offense charged and fairly informs the defendant of the charges against which he must defend, and second, whether it enables him to plead an acquittal or conviction in bar of future prosecutions for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “BUDDY SOHM is accused by this information of the crime of: DOMESTIC BATTERY, Idaho Code § 18-918 (3), committed as follows, to wit: That the said BUDDY SOHM, in POCA-TELLO, in the County of Bannock, State of Idaho, on or about the 11th DAY OF May, 2002, did inflict a traumatic injury upon another household member, VICKI HEGG, by striking her in the face and body resulting in traumatic injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.