State v. Hooper’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Burdett (2000), State v. Michelle Faye McIntosh (2016)
1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wolfe · State v. Cotton · State v. Arambula · State v. Shideler · State v. Seifart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As our Supreme Court has noted, the seriousness of a homicide offense mandates a punishment in the form of a substantial prison sentence. State v. Hooper, 119 Idaho 606, 609 , 809 P.2d 467, 470 (1991). A substantial sentence in this regard reflects society's condemnation of the defendant’s conduct, deters other members of society from engaging in similar conduct, and protects society from future crime. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brady
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.