119 Ind. App. 180 - Daugherty v. Daugherty’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2018
3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nill v. Comparet · Fish v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · 115 Ind. App. 253 - Daugherty v. Daugherty · Dinwiddie v. Shipman · Waring v. Fletcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an appeal from the judgment of the trial court does not have the effect of vacating the judgment of the trial court .... [and] [s]uch judgment is in full force and effect until it is reversed, and is binding on the parties as to every question decided.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.