119 Ind. App. 529 - Black v. Krauss’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1998
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 113 Ind. App. 65 - Pierce v. Clemens · Kist v. Coughlin · 118 Ind. App. 217 - Bulen v. Pendleton Banking Co. · Figart v. Halderman · 106 Ind. App. 495 - Central Pharmacal Co. v. Salb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““and as between such grantee and his grantor, the former becomes the principal debtor, while the latter becomes a surety.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““* * * And, ‘where a purchaser has assumed the payment of a mortgage and has subsequently conveyed the land to the mortgagee by a deed reciting that the conveyance is subject to a mortgage, . . . the mortgage will be regarded as paid and discharged, so that the mortgagee cannot maintain an action against the mortgagor upon the mortgage note, although the value of the land at the time of the conveyance is less than the debt secured. . . .’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In the instant case, if the circumstances shown amounted to a release by appellant of Luhring from his liability to pay the Barrett Law assessment, which liability was assumed by Luhring in the deed to him, Krauss would thereby be relieved from any liability to appellant on the bonds or for a deficiency arising upon a foreclosure.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.