Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 KAN 509 - State v. Adams

State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1967
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1967

4 state decisions

2019251930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. . Doody · State v. Horine · State v. Shives

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is of course not necessary in order to be material that the statements claimed to have constituted perjury should bear directly upon the ultimate fact to be proved. It is sufficient that they relate to any collateral matter upon which evidence would have been admissible.” (p. 511.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.