Pool v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2006
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Norton v. Reardon · Capital Bank v. Huntoon · Wyandotte State Bank v. Murray · Hughes v. Johnson · Windt v. Covert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Equitable matters, as distinct from legal questions as to the regularity of the sale, may be considered by the court in passing upon a motion to confirm a sale.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In actions to enforce a mortgage, ... no real estate shall be sold for the payment of any money . . . except in pursuance of a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction ordering such sale.” (Pool v. Gates, 119 Kan. 621, 625 , 240 Pac. 580 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McFall v. Ford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.