Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Md. App. 585 - State v. Webster

119 Md. App. 585 - State v. Webster’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tucker v. Fireman's Fund Insurance · Jones v. State · State v. Pagano · Romm v. Flax · State Ex Rel. Sonner v. Shearin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Given the sole reason for the sentence modification tendered by appellee and the circuit court, the trial court possessed no authority to deviate from this legislative mandate [that a mandatory sentence be imposed] via the sentence modification/review process, and thus, the court acted in excess of its jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.