¶1Prior to the enactment of the Civil Practice Act the rule was established that under section 2447 of the Code of Civil Procedure an order, such as was made in this case, directing a third party to pay over money to a receiver was unwarranted; that it was only articles of personal property belonging to the debtor in the possession or control of a third party that the judge or court was authorized to direct such third party to turn over to the receiver. West Side Bank v. Pugsley, 47 N. Y. 368; Knights of Pythias v. Man. Sav. Inst., 12 Misc. Rep. 626. The subject is now covered by section 793 of the Civil Practice Act, and that section is almost identical in its provisions with section 2447 of the Code.
¶2Under what must be regarded as the established construction given to the former statute an order requiring the appellant to pay over the surrender value of the policy was unauthorized. At most there was an indebtedness from the appellant to the debtor for the surrender value of the policy, and the amount of such indebtedness was neither money in the hands of the appellant belonging to the debtor nor was it an article of personal property within the meaning of the statute.
¶3Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
¶4All concur; present, Gut, Bijue and Mullan, JJ.
¶5Order reversed.