Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 MISS 526 - Shrader v. Shrader

Shrader v. Shrader’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
September 1984
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 1984 · most notably Brabham v. Brabham (1955), Bush v. Bush (1924)

27 state decisions

6019191920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haney v. Legg · Morrill v. Palmer · Batty v. Greene · Woodson v. Colored Grand Lodge of Knights of Honor of America · Shrader v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"One familiar illustration of a resulting trust is in those cases where lands have been bought with the wife's means and title taken in the husband's name. In the note to Haney v. Legg, 129 Ala. 619 , 30 So. 34 , 87 Am.St.Rep. 81 , it is stated, ` A resulting trust in favor of a wife is presumed from the purchase of property by her husband with her money and the taking of title in his name ;' ... ... . `It is not indispensable, however, that the whole of the purchase money should have been paid out of the funds belonging to the complainant. If any portion of it was her money, a resulting trust arises in her favor to the extent of the sum so used. '" 119 Miss. at 537-538 , 81 So. at 229 . (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.