Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

119 N.C. 912

26 S.E 1007

State v. . Baker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1896-09-05

INDICTMENT for murder, tried at Spring Term, 1896, of Swain Superior Court, before Timberlahe, The evidence in the trial was very voluminous. It appeared therefrom that the prisoners and deceased, with others, were at a distillery, all more or less drunk, and some of them quarrelsome and disposed to “ pick at ” and annoy the deceased, who was lying down on the floor, half drunk.

Decided 1896-09-05

*914 MONTGOMERY, J.:

¶1 The case on appeal is signed neither by the judge nor by counsel. There were no exceptions made to the charge of the court. Special instructions were asked by the defendants, but it does not appear whether they were given or refused. Only two objections were made to evidence, and they wore properly overruled by the court. The defendants were convicted of manslaughter (though charged with murder) and each one of them sentenced to serve a term of fifteen years in the State’s prison. There was a motion made for a new trial, but on what grounds does not appear, and from the overruling of the motion by his honor an appeal was prayed and allowed.

¶2 Notwithstanding the irregularities in the making up of the case on appeal, if it may be so called, we have, on account of the seriousness of the judgment, examined the case. The trial was fair, the charge of his honor full and just, covering every phase of the case.

¶3 It would seem from the reading of the testimony in this case that the defendants should be forever grateful to the jury for the verdict of manslaughter, that is, if they regard a not very long term in the penitentiary as preferable to capital punishment. There is no error, and the judgment below is affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/119/nc/912 · .json · Public domain