¶1There was error iu the ruling of the'court that the description was too vague and uncertain to be explained by parol testimony. Perry v. Scott, 109 N. C., 374.
¶2New Trial.
119 N.C. 95
Wilkins v. Jones
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 15, 1896
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1896-09-15
Civil aotioN, to recover land, tried before Boykin, J., and a jury, at Spring Term, 1896, of Nash Superior Court. The usual issues were submitted, and as the main issue depended upon the validity of a certain mortgage through which defendants claimed title, his Honor held that the description of the land was so vague and indefinite as to render the instrument void, and that it could not be aided by parol testimony.
Decided 1896-09-15