Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 N.C. App. 562 - State v. West

119 N.C. App. 562 - State v. West’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Commonwealth v. Stoute (1996), State v. Daniel (2000)

33 state decisions

130199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Florida v. Bostick · California v. Hodari D. · State v. Oquendo · 626 So. 2d 707 - State v. Tucker · State v. Brooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Constitution does not protect an individual from the mere approach of a police officer in a public place. State v. Streeter, 283 N.C. 203, 208 , 195 S.E.2d 502, 506 (1973). Hence, communications between the police and citizens not involving coercion or detention do not fall within the purview of the Fourth Amendment. State v. Perkerol, 77 N.C. App. 292, 298 , 335 S.E.2d 60, 64 (1985), disc. review denied, 315 N.C. 595 , 341 S.E.2d 36 (1986). No reasonable suspicion is needed in order for a police officer to ask questions of an individual, ask for an individual’s identification, or ask for consent to search his luggage as long as a reasonable person would understand he could refuse to cooperate. Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 434-35 , 115 L.Ed. 2d 389, 398-99 (1991).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] trial court’s findings of fact in a suppression hearing are binding on the appellate courts when supported by competent evidence. This Court must determine whether these findings of fact support the trial court’s conclusions of law, and if so, the trial court’s conclusions of law are binding on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “decline[d] [the defendant's request] to reject the United States Supreme Court's Hodari D. standard”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.