State v. Haberstroh’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Robinson v. Ignacio (2004), State v. Huebler (2012)
2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · Batson v. Kentucky · Godfrey v. Georgia · Clemons v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We realize that the stipulation here preceded our decision [that application of the procedural bar is mandatory] and that [prisoner] relied upon the stipulation and did not present evidence or argument in regard to cause for raising his claims. Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that we can treat the stipulation as establishing the facts to show cause to raise the relevant claims but allowing consideration of the claims’ merits only to determine the question of prejudice. This approach leaves the procedural default rules in effect and allows us to accept the stipulation and decide the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. Ignacio“concern that this argument likely induced the jurors to rest their sentence to a significant degree on the invalid aggravator”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“relied upon the stipulation and did not present evidence or argument in regard to cause for raising his claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dist. Ct.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.