Nieto v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2024
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anglin v. State · Kuykendall v. State · State v. Harnum · Pangallo v. State · Hart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“NRS 176.055(1) states that a defendant is entitled to credit against a sentence for time 'actually spent in confinement before conviction . . . .'”). The State urges us to overrule Kuykendall on the ground that it conflicts with the statute's plain language. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0, 1947A AND 4 III. "[U]nder the doctrine of stare decisis, we will not overturn [precedent] absent compelling reasons for so doing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Any prisoner who is confined to the state prison, any house of correction, any jail or any other place shall be granted credit against both the maximum and minimum terms of his sentence equal to the number of days during which the prisoner was confined in jail awaiting and during trial prior to the imposition of sentence and not under any sentence of confinement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Duran
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.