Meyer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Valdez v. State (2008), Nunnery v. State (2011)
6 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Remmer v. United States · Tanner v. United States · Remmer v. United States · United States v. Boylan · Jeffries v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prejudice is shown whenever there is a reasonable probability or likelihood that the juror misconduct affected the verdict.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment: (a) A juror shall not testify concerning the effect of anything upon the juror’s or any other juror’s mind or emotions as influencing the juror to assent to or dissent from the verdict or indictment or concerning the juror’s mental processes in connection therewith. (b) The affidavit or evidence of' any statement by a juror indicating an effect of this kind is inadmissible for any purpose.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Absent clear error, the district court's findings of fact will not be disturbed. However, where the misconduct involves allegations that the jury was exposed to extrinsic evidence in violation of the Confrontation Clause, [31 de novo review of a trial court's conclusions regarding the prejudicial effect of any misconduct is appropriate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.