Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 N.M. 104 - State v. Fuentes

State v. Fuentes’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
3
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably State v. Meadors (1995), State v. McGruder (1997)

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 46 state decisions

2001994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Adman v. United States · Swafford v. State · State v. Apodaca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]obbeiy can be presented under alternative theories: (1) robbery by threat of force; (2) robbery by use of force; (3) armed robbery by threat of force; or (4) armed robbery by use of force.”); New Mexico v. Sanchez, 1967-NMCA-009 , ¶ 12, 78 N.M. 284 , 430 P.2d 781 (to support robbery conviction, threatened use of force must be”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The fact that punishment for armed robbery is three times the punishment for aggravated battery is one point in favor of [d]efendant's position, but it is not alone persuasive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the central elements of robbery, even when dissected under a Franklin/Rodriguez analysis, do not subsume the elements of aggravated battery”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.