State v. Franks’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
82 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably State v. Torres (1999), Meiboom v. Watson (2000)
82 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Stansbury v. California · New York v. Quarles · California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although we may affirm a district court ruling on a ground not relied upon by the district court, we will not do so if reliance on the new ground would be unfair to the appellant. In particular, it would be unfair to an appellant to affirm on a fact-dependent ground not raised below.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it would be unfair to an appellant to affirm on a fact-dependent ground not raised below ... because the appellant lacked an opportunity to present admissible evidence relating to the fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if reliance on the new ground would be unfair to the appellant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.