Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 N.M. 252 - State v. Pisio

State v. Pisio’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Jacobs (2000), State v. Foster (1999)

5 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

290199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Colorado v. Connelly · 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · Oregon v. Bradshaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e should presume a legislative intent to punish as a single offense unitary conduct underlying multiple counts in certain circumstances. Those circumstances include not only unitary conduct resulting in charged offenses that have exactly the same elements, but also unitary conduct resulting in a charge of two offenses when one subsumes the other. [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the unlawful taking, restraining, transporting or confining of a person, by force, intimidation or deception with intent ... that the victim be held to service against [her] will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'special circumstances' " requiring merger, "double jeopardy principles do not preclude multiple punishment for both CSP II, felony, and kidnapping.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.