State v. Chandler’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Rojo (1998), State v. Boergadine (2005)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Hudson v. Palmer · Wade v. Shook · State v. Attaway · Lee v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nce the property owner answers the door, opens it, and sees uniformed officers, there is no need to destroy property through forced entry; the home is not defiled through a surprise assault; and the occupants will not resort to violence in the misapprehension that robbers have attacked their dwelling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Vargas“To assert that one can divest himself of constructive possession by treating the drugs as belonging to a roommate and having no intent of exercising dominion and control over the drugs may have some force as an abstract proposition; but the jury [was] free to find to the contrary on the evidence here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Phillips“once the occupants have voluntarily opened the door to uniformed officers, the requirements of the knock and announce rule are satisfied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Vargas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.