Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 N.M. 735 - Pena v. Mines

Pena v. Mines’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc. · V.P. Clarence Co. v. Colgate · Stueber v. Pickard · State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Roswell Independent Schools · Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute is explicit and unambiguous in the disclosure required. If the legislature had considered the matter, it may well have determined that a warning of loss of employment or perhaps a warning of possible criminal sanctions would be adequate. For whatever reasons, however, the legislature did not include such alternatives in the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.