Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 N.M. 89 - State v. Graves

State v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably State v. Martinez (1996), State v. Neal (2007)

26 state decisions

140199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Sokolow · Berkemer v. McCarty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recognizing presence alone as sufficient to detain a person found on premises subject to a search warrant would provide unlimited and unreviewable discretion. Such discretion, we believe, would betray the underlying principles of the Fourth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “mere presence does not justify the arrest or detention of a person, other than the resident, at a residence lawfully being searched.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a reasonable basis to believe that the non-resident has some type of connection to the premises or to criminal activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.