Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Ohio App. 169 - Cunningham v. Jerry Spears Co.

119 Ohio App. 169 - Cunningham v. Jerry Spears Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2019

5 state decisions

20196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The basic philosophy of judicial procedure revolves around the principles of fairness, relevance, reliability and public policy. See 42 American Jurisprudence, 460 et seq., Public Administrative Law, Section 129 et seq. The principles remain even though their formulation as technical court rules may be inappropriate to the operation of this agency. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in performing its public function of passing on claims, is to act to insure that an adequate basis for decision exists”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a decision made without a reasonable basis for decision is an arbitrary one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.