119 Ohio App. 3d 208 - State v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Smith · Madjorous v. State · Kyle v. Green · 27 Ohio App. 3d 275 - State v. Henson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject to constitutional constraints, the authority to fix punishment for crimes is vested exclusively in the legislature. See 28 Ohio Jurisprudence 3d (1993) 751, Criminal Law, Section 2816. See, also, Section 1 , Article II , Ohio Constitution; R.C. 2901.03 . The General Assembly has exercised its legislative power in prescribing penalties for crimes in R.C. 2929[.01,] et seq. Chapter 2929 declares the range of possible penalties as well as the guidelines for choosing the penalty to be imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he punishment of crime is indispensable to the safety of the community and the preservation of peace and order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.