Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Ohio App. 3d 261 - State Ex Rel. Eckstein v. Video Express

119 Ohio App. 3d 261 - State Ex Rel. Eckstein v. Video Express’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Hamling v. United States · Roth v. United States · Miller v. California · Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “actions for declaratory - 17 - Fayette CA2024-08-021 judgment [are] inappropriate where 'special statutory proceedings' would be bypassed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.