119 Ohio App. 3d 296 - Clark v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Pesek v. University Neurologists Ass'n (2000), 136 Ohio App. 3d 281 - Berge v. Columbus Community Cable Access (1999)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruni v. Tatsumi · Pang v. Minch · State v. Price · Cascone v. Herb Kay Co. · Calderon v. Sharkey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to see that counsel do not create an atmosphere which is surcharged with passion or prejudice and in which the fair and impartial administration of justice cannot be accomplished.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“cannot be held liable simply for his selection of a different procedure than another doctor might have used”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When argument spills into disparagement not based on any evidence, it is improper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.