119 Ohio App. 3d 361 - State v. Musick’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a court violates a defendant's right to be free from double jeopardy when it attempts to enhance a defendant's sentence after he acquires a legitimate and reasonable expectation of finality in the severity of his sentence. Id. at (citation omitted). {¶ 65} In the instant matter, Battersby acquired no such”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Battersby, 2007-L-023 (2-29-2008)

2. “Under the multiple punishment component of the Double Jeopardy Clause, * * * the inquiry focuses upon whether the accused has been (1) punished twice for (2) the same offense by (3) separate proceedings.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Battersby, 2007-L-023 (2-29-2008)

3. “The Double Jeopardy Clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions protect the accused from (1) multiple prosecutions for the same offense and (2) multiple punishments for the same offense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Battersby, 2007-L-023 (2-29-2008)