Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Ohio App. 3d 402 - Trimble-Weber v. Weber

119 Ohio App. 3d 402 - Trimble-Weber v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2024

15 state decisions

701997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Daggett v. Gessaman · 141 Ohio St. 584 - Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co. · 33 Ohio App. 3d 220 - Biskupich v. Westbay Manor Nursing Home · Hanson v. Kynast · 68 Ohio App. 3d 783 - Shaver v. Standard Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Should it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion for summary judgment that the party cannot for sufficient reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify the party's opposition, the court may refuse the application for judgment or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had or may make such other order as is just.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Upon request of any party or order of the court the officer shall transcribe the deposition. The officer shall certify on the transcribed deposition that the witness was fully sworn or affirmed by the officer and that the transcribed deposition is a true record of the testimony given by the witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If a document is not of the type enumerated in Civ.R. 56(C), a trial court may consider that document when ruling on a motion for summary judgment if there is no objection. However, it is well within the trial court's discretion to ignore these documents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.