119 Ohio App. 3d 501 - State v. Neuhoff’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Fanning · 73 Ohio App. 3d 486 - State v. Klein · City of Xenia v. Wallace · State v. Shindler · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n order to support a motion to suppress, with particular facts that would put the state on notice of the areas to be challenged, a defendant must first complete due and diligent discovery, on all issues which he or she intends to challenge, in the motion to suppress.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[T]o require a hearing on a motion to *Page 4 suppress evidence, the [defendant] must state the motion's legal and factual bases with sufficient particularity to place the prosecutor and the court on notice of the issues to be decided.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.