Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Ohio App. 3d 82 - Michaels v. Berliner

119 Ohio App. 3d 82 - Michaels v. Berliner’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2023

11 state decisions

401997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vahila v. Hall · 66 Ohio App. 3d 826 - Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Central Ohio Building & Construction Trades Council · Surace v. Wuliger · Post v. Mendel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the privilege `does not give a person carte blanche to defame another on the mere condition that a judicial proceeding is mentioned in, or somehow connected to, the defamatory statement.' Extrajudicial communications, those statements not submitted as evidence, as a pleading, during oral argument or in any other court document, require closer examination. To come within the privilege, an extrajudicial communication must be: (1) made in the regular course of preparing for or conducting such a proceeding; (2) pertinent and material to the redress or relief sought; and, (3) published only to persons who are directly interested in the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To come within the privilege . . . a statement not published as part of a judicial proceeding must, at least, be made in the regular course of preparing for or conducting such a proceeding and be pertinent and material to the redress or relief sought. Further, it must be published only to persons who are directly interested in the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Statements made 'in a written pleading or brief, or in an oral statement to a judge or jury in open court, is absolutely privileged if it has some reasonable relation to the judicial proceeding in which it appears.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.