State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably State v. Holdcroft (2013), State v. Christian (Slip Opinion) (2020)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · North Carolina v. Pearce · Burks v. United States · Green v. United States · State v. Foster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) `a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal,' (2) `a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction,' and (3) `multiple punishments for the same offense.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'is that the State with all its resources and power should not be allowed to make repeated attempts to convict an individual for the alleged offense, thereby subjecting him to embarrassment, expense and ordeal and compelling him to live in a continuing state of anxiety and insecurity, as well as enhancing the possibility that even though innocent he may be found guilty.' " State v. Roberts , 119 Ohio St.3d 294 , 2008-Ohio-3835 , 893 N.E.2d 818 , ¶ 11, quoting Green v. United States , 355 U.S. 184 , 187-188, 78 S.Ct. 221 , 2 L.Ed.2d 199 (1957). The federal and state constitutions' double jeopardy protection further guards citizens against cumulative punishments for the "same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hollinger“a stay pending review in a criminal appeal * * * preserves the status quo of the litigation pending appellate review and suspends the power of the lower court to issue execution of the judgment or sentence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grenoble
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.