Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 OHIOST3D 406 - State v. Mays

State v. Mays’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

623
cited by 623 later decisions
5
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

619 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 623 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Regis (2011), 163 Ohio St. 3d 421 - State v. Turner (Slip Opinion) (2020)

619 state decisions

3960200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Whren v. United States · Delaware v. Prouse · Berkemer v. McCarty · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 623 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if an officer's decision to stop a motorist for a criminal violation, including a traffic violation, is prompted by a reasonable and articulable suspicion considering all the circumstances, then the stop is constitutionally valid.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]n officer is not required to determine whether someone who has been observed committing a crime might have a legal defense to the charge.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(A) Whenever any roadway has been divided into two or more clearly marked lanes for traffic, or wherever within municipal corporations traffic is lawfully moving in two or more substantially continuous lines in the same direction, the following rules apply: (1) A vehicle or trackless trolley shall be driven, as nearly as is practicable, entirely within a single lane or line of traffic and shall not be moved from such lane or line until the driver has first ascertained that such movement can be made with safety.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.