Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 OHIOST3D 422 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

131
cited by 131 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 117 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Leyh (Slip Opinion) (2022), McGuire v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution (2013)

4 federal appellate · 117 state decisions

760200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grava v. Parkman Township · State v. Murnahan · State v. D'Ambrosio · 104 Ohio St. 3d 142 - Morgan v. Eads · Holzemer v. Urbanski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n application for reopening shall be granted if there is a genuine issue as to whether the applicant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Ohio Appellate Rule 26 provides: A defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. An application for reopening shall be filed in the court of appeals where the appeal was decided within ninety days from journalization of the appellate judgment.... Ohio R.App. P. 26(B)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The filing of a motion seeking a discretionary appeal in this court does not create a bar to a merit ruling on a timely-filed application to reopen an appeal claiming ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under App. R. 26(B).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.