Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Okla. 176 - Cantrell v. McLemore

Cantrell v. McLemore’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 1951
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 1951

15 state decisions

801926193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. Markham · Fitch v. Braddock · Wheelan v. Hunt · Roberts v. Harrington · Ludeman v. English

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a broker fails to bring the minds of the parties to an agreement and the transaction is abandoned, and afterwards the owner-, through his own efforts, without fraud, effects a sale, the broker is not entitled to a commission, because he is not the procuring cause of the sale.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.