Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Okla. 182 - Shaw v. Stevenson

Shaw v. Stevenson’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Railroad Company v. Stout · Chandler v. Colcord · Bagg v. Shoenfelt · N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works v. R. D. Cole Mfg. Co. · Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Davern

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A motion for a continuance, on account of the absence of evidence, can be made only upon affidavit, showing the materiality of the evidence expected to be obtained, and that due diligence has been used to obtain it, and where the evidence may be; and if it is for an absent witness, the affidavit must show where the witness resides, if his residence is known to the party, and the probability of procuring his testimony within a reasonable time, and what facts he believes the witness will prove,.and that he bePeves them to be true. If thereupon, the adverse party will consent that on the trial the facts alleged in the affidavit shall be read and treated as the deposition of the absent witness, or that the facts in relation to other evidence shall be taken as proved to the extent alleged in the affidavit, no continuance shall be granted on the ground of the absence of such evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.