Loomis v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1964
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa City · Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of Enid · McPherrin v. Tittle · Echols v. Reeburgh · Shawnee Nat. Bank v. Wootten & Potts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘•‘None of these circumstances, nor all of them, are considered by this court to raise any issue of fact upon the question of plaintiff’s status as an innocent purchaser, in view of the uncontradicted evidence of plaintiff and Bushman which appears in the record.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ramsay v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.