Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 Okla. 5 - Reed v. Reed

Reed v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 1953
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1953

11 state decisions

501926193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beach v. Beach · Privett v. Privett · Large v. Large · Smith v. Smith · Barker v. Barker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Marriage is a contract, and a relation which, if possible, should endure, and public policy requires that there be no straining of law or facts to end the contract and sever the relation. Time will heal many estrangements, and bring together those whom temporary feeling has alienated. And courts, having ever in view the public good, may often wisely use their discretion to give tim'e and opportunity for reconciliation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In a divorce case, where the evidence is conflicting and there is sufficient competent evidence to support the findings of the court and the decree based thereon, the same will not be disturbed on appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.