Fales v. Multnomah County’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2011
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Sllverton · Elliott v. Tillamook County · Clark v. Hood River County · First National Bank v. County Court of Yamhill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“their power is only coextensive with the power thereby expressly granted, or necessarily or reasonably implied from their granted powers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When a power is given by statute everything necessary to make it effectual is given by implication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.