Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 P3D 388 - State v. Huber

State v. Huber’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc. · Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in a variety of specific ways. Depending on the circumstances, these may include otherwise-admissible booking photographs, booking fingerprints, eyewitness identification, or, arguably, distinctive personal information. But the State does not meet its burden merely because the defense opts not to present evidence; if the State presents insufficient evidence, the defendant’s election not to rebut it does not suddenly cause it to become sufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.