In Re Domingo’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2022
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Bousley v. United States · Schriro Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Summerlin · 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · State v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not apply to a petition or motion that is based solely on ... a significant change in the law, whether substantive or procedural, which is material to the conviction [or] sentence,... and either the legislature has expressly provided that the change in the law is to be applied retroactively, or a court, in interpreting a change in the law that lacks express legislative intent regarding retroactive application, determines that sufficient reasons exist to require retroactive application of the changed legal standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.