¶1 The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Culver. The statement in the opinion that “It was too late [for the defendant], to declare the forfeiture after plaintiff had tendered him the full amount due him in accordance with his demands,” is sustained by the language used by Mr. Justice Kephart in the case of White Co. to use, etc. v. Union Transfer Co., 270 Pa. 514, 517, 113 A. 432.
119 Pa. Super. 382
181 A 387
Cunningham v. Kitchen
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 21, 1935
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1935-10-21
Relies on Use v. Union Transfer Co.
Decided 1935-10-21