119 So. 2d 803 - Diecidue v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Victor v. State · 104 So. 2d 391 - Harrison v. State · Adams v. State · Holliday v. State · Barkley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At the time of the raid the appellant (petitioner here) was not present, nor did the state prove that he ever handled any of the * * * lottery paraphernalia which was seized. His conviction was on circumstantial evidence and no testimony was offered by the [ appellant ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“* * * there is circumstantial evidence from which the jury could have concluded, as it did in the verdict, that the defendant was implicated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“especially in the absence of contrary or exculpatory evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.