Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 SO3D 1119 - Ross v. State

Ross v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 42 So. 3d 503 - Rowland v. State · 872 So. 2d 711 - Williams v. State · White v. State · Gowdy v. State · 549 So. 2d 949 - Keyes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All indictments may be amended as to form but not as to the substance of the offense charged. Indictments may also be amended to charge the defendant as [a] habitual offender or to elevate the level of the offense where the offense is one which is subject to enhanced punishment for subsequent offenses and the amendment is to assert prior offenses justifying such enhancement .... Amendment shall be allowed only if the defendant is afforded a fair opportunity to present a defense and is not unfairly surprised.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.