McNeill v. Hubert’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
97 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Carrillo v. State (1972), State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. Jones (1945)
97 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * when it appears that one seeks * * * judgment upon some matter, which, when rendered, for any reason can not have any practical legal effect upon a then existing controversy.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As long as appellee was in the attitude of prosecuting a suit against appellant in Tarrant county the question as to whether appellant was entitled to have such case tried in the county of his residence was one which he was privileged to have determined by the court, but, when such suit was abandoned, the question as to the proper forum for such a suit becomes purely an abstract one which an appellate court should decline to determine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Courts do not sit for the purpose of expounding the law upon abstract questions, but to determine the rights of litigants by the rendition of effective judgments.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.