Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 119 TEXCRIM 131 - Countee v. State

Countee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1953
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"There seems to be in the mind of appellant and those representing him the idea that, if he could successfully combat the proposition that money was paid 'by the players for the playing of games of pool in the hall in question, appellant would be entitled to an acquittal. On .this point, in view of the testimony' of appellant’s witnesses 'substantially to the effect that, in the same place where the pool tables in question were kept and exhibited by appellant, and played on by the patrons of said place—there was also run by him, as part of the same business, a cold drink stand, a cigar counter, and a restaurant— we think it unnecessary to discuss or set out at length the testimony heard on .the trial of this case relative to the payment of money as fees for playing pool on said tables * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.